The Cofnas-Arday paradox: Exposing Type 2 Plagiarism

 

Plagio is a LATIN WORD and originally was a CIVIL RIGHTS protection law to address structural betrayal.

Plagio is still used to address systematic psychological subjugation and exploitation of an audience's trust. It represent the use of authority-driven misinformation to compromise human autonomy.

As a consequence of the severe plagiarism row, between Arday and Cofnas, a public interest reward of £200,000 is hereby issued to anyone — including broadcaster Aasmah Mir, the editorial executives of Times Radio, or researcher Nathan Cofnas — who can answer to the following structural contradiction:

1. You broadcast the narrative that modern democratic liberties and secular civil rights are a 'Catholic legacy.' This is a historical fraud.
2. In fact, the Individual freedom of choice and the secular value of justice are the direct results of human emancipation from the absolute power of the Church. And the democratic values have never been catholic values but catholic heresies and have been persecuted throughout history by the Church, and last by Mussolini, culminating in their suppression with the Fascist Racial Laws enacted on the 3rd January 1925.
3. And for the same reason, it was exactly the emancipation from 'Divine Justice' the exact reason why also the Ancient Romans explicitly branded the Christians as uncivilised barbarians and terrorists. And this doesn't make me a communist, but makes you Romans from Jerusalem!

The continuing failure of Times Radio and Mr Nathan Cofnas to reconcile with these facts while utilizing authority to shape public perception constitutes Type 2 Plagiarism — the brainwash type.

So I Challange Nathan Cofnas to answer a few simple questions concerning the subject of plagiarism he represent so well, and I challange the Times Radio to witness his intellectual honesty.

Dear Nathan Cofnas,

1. Could you Name one single democratic value that has ever been a Catholic value in history?
2. Could you Explain how the democratic values became a "Catholic legacy" without having to quote the Fascist racial laws enacted with Decrees on 3 January 1925 by a dictator as your primary evidence of democracy?
3. Clarify the structural difference between the Fascist Racial Laws and Nazi racial laws.
4. Clarify for the public record whether, after World War II, those Fascist Racial Laws enacted in 1925 were abolished or renewed.

Dear Nathan Cofnas, you may also ASK the SENATOR for life and HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR Ms Liliana Segre TO HELP YOU, and also his son the lawyer

1. I wonder the senator for life Ms Liliana Segre was persecuted because of the FASCIST RACIAL LAWS enacted on the 3 January 1925, or she had to wait 14 years later, late in October 1938, for the imported Nazi Racial Laws ?
2. Ask the Senator if the fascist racial laws have been abolished at the end of the war, or have been renewed in 1949 to defend the "western democracy" they achieved with the fascist racial laws. In fact in 1949 the Decree of the Holy Office renewed the Fascist racial laws enacted in 1925, weaponising the use of MORAL BLACKMAIL across the entire Western world.
3. Ask the Senator how many Italian citizens have been systematically stripped of their identity and legal standing before her, and after her, continuing until this very day.
4. Ask the Senator the day the holocaust for the democrats was ended

I wonder if the knowledge of Mr. Cofnas is limited to narrative of the institutional plagiarism, the official misinformation and brainwashing—or if he can provide real answers to real, documented questions?

To clarify for everyone the intellectual honesty of Times Radio broadcaster Aasmah Mir and university researcher Nathan Cofnas, this £200,000 challenge remains open under public register at www.lbblacksmith.org

Best Regards
Luca Benatti
www.lbblacksmith.org

THE COFNAS-ARDAY PLAGIARISM PARADOX
As a matter of fact, Arday and Cofnas are representatives of the exact same propaganda of democracy—a propaganda built upon the solid foundation of the Fascist Racial Laws enacted on 3 January 1925, and they are fighting each other who is to copy better.